Reply to Boundary Review Meetings

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m just wondering, those who are opposed to Sangster split feeder, why does it matter to you? If your kids aren’t involved, let us fight for what we want for our kids. If the split makes both sides happy.  And no one is objecting it.    Yes the overcrowding is an issue. But that will be fixed if they would audit the school for those who truly live in the boundaries.  [/quote]

I'm a sangster parent and am all for erasing the split feeder.  I don't want part of my kids social group to dissappear in middle school and would love stability for all kids. [/quote]

My kid went through Sangster and finished in the WSHS pyramid after 6th grade.

This is [i]exactly[/i] how all the parents felt about the split feeder.  They wanted to keep their Sangster community together, with everyone going to Lake Braddock.  The way it is now, only the AAP kids frim that neighborhood get to go to Lake Braddock.

No offense to WSHS (it's a great school) but I am shocked that the Sangster parents of the little kids are fighting this.  We would have rejoiced if they has proposed this a few years back so our kids could retain their community and go with all the other Sangster kids to Lake Braddock.  The Sangster split feeder really highlights the difference between options for the AAP kids who get to keep their Sangster friends and go to LB, vs the non AAP kids who had to separate from their friends and go to Irving.

The pushback does not make sense, especially since they are using keeping their friends together as the reason to fight.  All their friends will go to Lake Braddock with them.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics