Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Airplane noise concerns overblown?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Is this about the study available on NIH about the risk of malignant brain tumors increasing if you choose to live under a flight path? “Malignant brain cancer risk in all subjects combined increased 12% (95% CI 0.98–1.27) per interquartile range (IQR) of airport-related UFP exposure (~6700 particles per cm3) for subjects with any address in the grid area surrounding the LAX airport.” A 95% confidence interval of 0.98–1.27 means that there is a 95% chance that the true population parameter (like a mean, proportion, or risk) falls within that range. In conclusion, you do you. But hell no. Not worth the risk. No idea how you could even consider buying a house under a flight path unless someone tricked you. (like a slick Palisades real estate agent telling you to relax and have a drink and you’ll get used to it) [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
