Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "The Bike Lobby is too powerful in DC..."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]A driver, bicyclist and pedestrian walk into a bakery. The baker brings them a plate of 12 cookies. The driver quickly snatches up 11 cookies, turns to the pedestrian and says, “Watch out! The bicyclist is going to steal your cookie!”[/quote] The bakery closed because there was nowhere to park. Now no one gets a cookie. [/quote] 2/3 of the bakery's customers arrive on foot or by bike. Why would it close due to lack of car parking?[/quote] 66/100 arrive by foot and 1/100 arrives by bike. Your statement is still true. But the bakery lost 33/100 so it had to close. [/quote] Every study, everywhere, has shown that bike lanes benefit businesses. [/quote] And yet developers keep lobbying for parking because they know that people will travel farther in a car than they will on a bike or by foot, thus increasing the size of the customer base for retail. [/quote] ??? Developers are not lobbying for parking. They would simply rather build parking where it rationally makes sense and not build parking where it doesn't, but zoning usually proscribes (too much) parking so buying/renting costs more.[/quote] But when the developers get relief from zoning-mandated parking minimums do they pass on the cost savings to tenants and purchasers?[/quote] In a competitive rental market they do which is why we need to build more housing. There are buildings with lots of parking and buildings with no parking. There are buildings in convenient locations with great access to retail, schools, parks and public transportation and buildings in locations with none of those things. There are residents with lots of cars who need to do lots of driving, residents with 1 car who only occassionally drive and residents who don't need cars at all. If the real estate market has adaquate supply landlords and sellers will have to price what they are offering for the demand because buyers will have options and the money saved in buildings that didn't include parking will get passed on to renters/owners. In frantic markets where sellers dictate prices and there is little choice they will pocket the savings.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics