Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Why are people more sympathetic to Lindsay Clancy than Andrea Yates? (Child death mentioned)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]https://www.necn.com/news/national-international/she-killed-the-kids-prosecutors-outline-chilling-timeline-in-duxbury-tragedy/2924108/ Here is the detailed timeline of the day of the murders. It is bone chilling. [/quote] The reason he asked her “what did you do” on finding her outside, and not “who did this?” or the equivalent is because he knew she was off. It’s not a question that supports the assessment that everything seemed normal on the day of.[/quote] Untrue. Did you read the timeline. Everything was normal. He said "what did you do" because she had clearly jumped out a window when she was supposed to be watching them. That doesn't mean anything was abnormal prior to his leaving.. [/quote] I did read the timeline. It says he found her on the ground and that she was bleeding (and presumably already paralyzed). He had not yet been far enough into the house to find the children. If I came home to my house and found my husband laying in the snow on our lawn bleeding, I doubt I would immediately get to the conclusion that he had jumped out of a window to get there. But my husband is not currently suicidal. When he was suicidal, I would have gotten there faster, which is why I say the husband knew something was not right with her.[/quote] +1 while incredibly disturbing to all of us because we want to feel like this could never happen to someone we love and there must be a clear sign, nothing presented seems contradictory to this potentially being psychosis. Psychosis isn’t always visible or slurring of words like they seem to be describing (saying she wasn’t slurring her words with the pharmacist etc) it can be silent and very scary in someone’s head. I also look up on googlemaps how far it is to a restaurant before deciding to get takeout all the time.. the fact that she was recently hospitalized with thoughts of harming herself and her children indicates a much more likely scenario that something wasn’t right, rather than she is weirdly and abnormally evil even though nothing prior in her life indicated that? It doesn’t make sense.[/quote] Once again, her lawyers, who know a lot more about the case and her than you do, AREN’T USING THE PSYCHOSIS DEFENSE.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics