Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let’s talk about the crime fraud exception Freedman has alleged in the Jones case (and maybe will allege in the Lively case, since he said he’s preparing more motions). Apparently this is a big deal and is not used often. Any lawyers have thoughts?[/quote] I'm a lawyer but not well-versed in tech, and a lot of the arguments are technical so I can't really opine. FWIW, Jones filed a MTD in Jones v. Abel explaining why she believes that these criminal statutes do not apply to her conduct. I can't weigh in whether those arguments are accurate but here it is: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782.56.0.pdf And here is Wayfarer's letter from the Lively docket asserting that violation of these statutes supports waiving the privilege due to this exception: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.94.0_2.pdf There might need to be additional briefing or a hearing on this issue. Wayfarer is going to need to articulate specifically how this meets the elements of fraud (there is an argument to be made that Lively's attorneys defrauded NY courts by making false representations in the Doe lawsuit, but not sure if there's a clear argument for Jones committing fraud by responding to the subpoena) and/or for the criminal argument what personal, non-work product related information of Abel's that Jones illegally accessed or disseminated. In the alternative, Wayfarer argues for an in camera inspection which means Edgeworth produces their documents and they are given to the judge directly to decide what gets delivered to Wayfarer,, instead of Jones and Edgeworth deciding what they turn over. That might be the best way to go. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics