Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Baldoni’s neurodivergence/ADHD itself isn’t a secret fwiw. There was a People magazine article about it here:  https://people.com/justin-baldoni-reveals-he-was-diagnosed-with-adhd-at-40-8756535

This says he was diagnosed when he was 40, and he was born in January 1984, so he was probably dealing with his diagnosis during the IEWU film actually. [/quote]

The legal argument BF is making is about relevance. The interrogatory asks for information on JB’s neurodivergence and BL’s team make the argument that it’s relevant b/c he’s communicated about it in connection with BL’s SH allegations. BF proceeded to ask, oh really, when did he do that? And Blake’s lawyers said “it’s in the discovery”, referring to Van Sham. So essentially they need to establish why JB having neurodivergence is relevant to their case and they can’t do that without the Vanzan text messages. I didn’t know about the People article, but it wouldn’t matter to BF’s argument. [/quote]

They should have just referred to whatever complaint it was in. It's clear they had it, so that's not new information for BF if he read all the pleadings. Very dumb on the part of Blake's lawyer to say it was in the discovery.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics