Reply to Epstein Files

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Epstein Files"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump called early on:

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html[/quote]

You can see Trump set a trap.

He will spring the good stuff right before the midterms for the maximum land mine.[/quote]

Yes.  This has been discussed today.  It doesn't mean that he wasn't involved in the abuse, early, often, and in other settings as well.  We know this.[/quote]

It also doesn't mean he was.  What are you basing that on, other than hopium?[/quote]

Keep your head in the sand, roastie.[/quote]

I am actually be serious.  Accusing someone of pedophilia, trafficking, etc. is a very serious thing and really shouldn't be done without real evidence.  Is there actual evidence, even circumstantial, that Trump himself was involved in the Epstein-related crimes? [/quote]
Plenty enough that he should answer questions under oath.[/quote]

I am totally fine with that, in terms of him answering questions because there is obviously evidence of Trump being in Epstein's orbit.  But are you saying there is "plenty" of evidence that Trump was actually or even potentially involved in illegal activities connected to Epstein?[/quote]

Think about it this way. You are the POTUS. Your administration holds evidence about a sex trafficking/pedophile ring. People are saying that you are involved, based on past behavior (being held liable for sexual assault, walking among naked teenagers during the Miss Teen USA pageant, ex-wife accusing you of marital rape, you being on the record as grabbing women by their privates and kissing them without consent), and the fact that your name appears in these files thousands of times.

If you wanted to clear your name, what would you do? Would you ask your DOJ to release everything, so people can see what information there is to see? Or would you withhold and redact information (in such a hamfisted way that us normies can figure out that they even redacted the word don't), so you actually look guilty? [b]Trump's knee jerk reaction to everything is to sue people, and if he is being accused without basis, you know that's what he would reach for. So why isn't he?[/b]
[/quote]

Exactly.  One of the most litigious persons ever, and he is not suing.  I’m not the smartest bear in the woods, but I think I can figure this one out![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics