Reply to Epstein Files

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Epstein Files"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump called early on:

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html[/quote]

You can see Trump set a trap.

He will spring the good stuff right before the midterms for the maximum land mine.[/quote]

Yes.  This has been discussed today.  It doesn't mean that he wasn't involved in the abuse, early, often, and in other settings as well.  We know this.[/quote]

It also doesn't mean he was.  What are you basing that on, other than hopium?[/quote]

Keep your head in the sand, roastie.[/quote]

I am actually be serious.  Accusing someone of pedophilia, trafficking, etc. is a very serious thing and really shouldn't be done without real evidence.  Is there actual evidence, even circumstantial, that Trump himself was involved in the Epstein-related crimes? [/quote]
Plenty enough that he should answer questions under oath.[/quote]

I am totally fine with that, in terms of him answering questions because there is obviously evidence of Trump being in Epstein's orbit.  But are you saying there is "plenty" of evidence that Trump was actually or even potentially involved in illegal activities connected to Epstein?[/quote]

Yes.  He sent massage therapists from his club over to Epstein and they were repeatedly sexually harassed.  That right there is involvement.  The first time, you can claim ignorance, but the second and third and fourth time?  That's sending lambs to the slaughter.  Knowingly.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics