Reply to Taylor's Feb Rec for Crown Boundary Study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Taylor's Feb Rec for Crown Boundary Study"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not sure who caught this, but the reason the board decided against passing the MS change is pretty much they didn't want any more meetings. So thanks Anti-H. Basically everyone is sick of hearing from you. [/quote]

Because they said it is out of order to propose resolutions this late.

You know what’s out of order?
Building a school with money and kids you don’t have.

Doing a HS boundary and then an ES one. [/quote]

Agree. And also, MCPS could have presented it as a modified recommendation. It didn't have to go through as a resolution. All signs point to H passing so it just really stinks for those kids impacted. [/quote]

Yeah, it was a mistake to do Middle School / High School boundaries only and not touch ES boundaries when we have something like Rosemont being split into three pieces.

I assume the Stone Mill / Travilah Middle School assignments will be looked at again when they do the ES / MS boundary study.[/quote]

Sorry, so to confirm, by saying the middle school study failed, does this mean middle school articulations will remain the same as they are now or remain as they are in modified option H?

If they remain the same as they are now while the rest of mod option H goes through that would be so chaotic. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics