Reply to Trapped/Re-aging Families, How are you having the conversation?

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Trapped/Re-aging Families, How are you having the conversation?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ok so we're getting closer. It sounds like you admit that using rae logic that young grade older players would be in the group most likely to be playing up. Now just sprinkle a little club incentive to play young players with their grade for recruiting and boom. You have teams that are playing by grade.[/quote]No, this is where again you no knowing English as a first language becomes a problem with communication and could be why you are confused. Read the 9 clubs that say that playing up is rare and playing on age is their guiding light. Clubs go towards the oldest on each team. It's science.[/quote]
Its funny how when you get backed into a corner you just strawman your way out. This time its knowing English other times August guy.

You believe in rae I outlined how it would affect teams. Now you're interpreting rare as never happening. When it could easily mean 3-4 "rare" players playing up per top team. Especially when recruiting for college is added to the mix and players are expected to play with their grade.

Its going to be fun watching you continue to say clubs wont roster by grade when ECNL player profiles are listed next season.[/quote]Older kids  tend to get top teams, younger kids tend to get overlooked almost nobody gets to play up. So August kids have an advantage and July has a disadvantage under SY. Basic stuff.[/quote]
So in SY because of rae August birthdays (followed by September birthdays) are the ones most likely to be playing up. Yes or No?[/quote] For competitive clubs, nobody gets to play up (except National teamers which would be skewed towards Jan-May) and July, June and May will on average struggle for top team slots in SY like Oct, Nov and Dec struggled under BY. So nobody is likely to play up because the top team slots are taken by the older player birthdates in the age group. [/quote]
That makes no sense. Now because you refuse to admit the obvious you're mixing BY into SY. You also added that only National Team players would be the only ones play up which was not written or defined anywhere.

So slimy just admit the truth.[/quote]It's over. ECNL didn't want players playing up except in very rare circumstances on a case by case basis and teams agreed. 9 to 1.[/quote]
I went back and listened to the ECNL podcast and I dont think your interpretation is correct. It sounded to me that Lavars didnt want younger teams playing up a level. Which makes sense if you want to maintain the credibility of the league. I don't think he was talking about individual players.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics