Reply to ABC News interview TONIGHT with Biden

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "ABC News interview TONIGHT with Biden"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Too bad only one candidate is attracting millions of Americans to come on board to make America great again, and it ain’t your big guy.[/quote]

Trump already had 4 years to make America great but instead we had a bunch of disastrous policies, broken promises, hundreds of thousands of Americans dying because they thought a pandemic was a hoax, that vaccines and health measures were all an evil plot, and the economy crashed.[/quote]

The world wasn’t on fire when Trump was president. It was under Biden that we had the humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan and the loss of lives he doesn’t even remember in a presidential debate, and conflicts from Gaza to Ukraine. It was Biden who swung open the border, to the point that he WSJ reports today that the government placed migrant children in unsafe homes with unvetted guardians (probably for work and sex trade) simply to avoid the bad optics of “caging” them like Obama did. Inflation has roared and the economy soured, and under Biden we have had more covid deaths even with the vaccine.[/quote]

strange what you say about the economy, my 401k looks fantastic.[/quote]

If you're rich, economy is great. If you're poor, inflation outstripping cost of living has made things difficult. That's the reality. Democrats are clearly not for poor people. [/quote]
Much of middle class America is also struggling like never before. Democrats are a disaster.[/quote]
Two burrito bowls at Chipotle with the all the works (guac, cheese, meat, ) were 21 dollars in 2020.

Now, it’s 33 dollars .

The Dems want to keep pretending as if the price of food and everything else didn’t go up .

Americans are being crushed by credit card debt right now and a slower job market as well as inflation esp grocery store prices .

I am sure Americans miss the stimulus checks , PPP loans, lower taxes, and most importantly, lowest interest rates in American history under Trump[/quote]

Chipotle is making record profits.   Their suppliers are making record profits.  https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/24/chipotle-mexican-grill-cmg-q1-2024-earnings.html

The problem isn't Biden, it's greedy companies.  [/quote]

Companies have to maximize profits for their investors. That’s a fact. It’s not greed.[/quote]

That’s not what voters know or care about. All they see is that under Biden, the price of essential items like grocery bills went up [/quote]

Then we will get the fascist state that we deserve.[/quote]

[b]Yeah yeah. We heard this in 2016 as well.[/b]

Why didn’t Trump make himself dictator for life then? He left office didn’t he?

Will hand wringing  and Dem fearmongering  always work on you ?[/quote]
And those warnings were correct. Like Roe and January 6th. [/quote]

Roe was in danger because of RBG not Trump. Before Trump was even elected, Obama was pleading with her to resign . She had cancer and was like 90 something years old. She’s another Biden. Someone who overstayed their welcome and was too stubborn to leave. Obama should’ve had 2 SC picks : Merrick Garland and RBG. RBG should’ve stepped down in 2012 during
The first term  not even 2016.

Now Clarence will retire if Trump wins.

[/quote]

Obama the Great could have passed an abortion bill through Congress, perhaps even as part of Obamacare. He didn't move a finger.[/quote]

Nice try. Trump has bragged about his role in overturning Roe v Wade.[/quote]

Which was only possible to do because Obama didn't move a finger.[/quote]

I’m a conservative and disagree. The logic of the Roe vs Wade overrun is that it’s a state issue, so a congressional law binding all the states would have fallen as well.[/quote]

What are you talking about. We have separation of powers in this country.

Congress is well within its authority to pass a NATIONAL legislation on abortion. What SCOTUS said was that there is no Constitutional Right to abortion. Go back and talk to any lawyers or political science professors. Geez, I thought most on this board were relatively informed or had basic knowledge.[/quote]

You have to be kidding me.  Read the constitution:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.“

Nothing in the constitution gives the federal government the authorization to regulate abortion.

Geez I thought most on this board could read and understand both the constitution and judicial rulings.

[/quote]

If you follow the SCOTUS which has the power to interpret the Constitution, you would know that the 19th amendment is not interpreted literally - half of the federal laws and regulations would be void under the literal interpretation. Keep up. [/quote]

Take the loss. Attempting to move abortion which is a state issue to the federal level violates the constitution and the courts acknowledge this. Learn to read.[/quote]

I have yet to see anyone make a solid argument about how it "violates the constitution" other than "it's not in the constitution."   99% of what's been upheld by courts isn't explicitly in the constitution, either.[/quote]

Even Ruth Bader Ginsberg said Roe v Wade was a badly construed ruling. It was always fiction that kept it alive longer than it should have been.

Moving abortion back to the states has allowed people to have greater input over the laws, which is what it should be, and it is through the voters and elected officials that we are inching towards a new and more stable abortion policy in the US rather than some immovable ruling that infuriated too many people for too many decades. Had the voters been allowed to vote, state by state, on abortion starting in the 60s/70s, we'd have EU style abortion compromise laws right now across most of the country that would make most people happy and it wouldn't even be a topic any more. [/quote]

Yes, Roe was poorly constructed.  But that absolutely does not rule out the possibility of Congress codifying Roe into law.  SCOTUS wouldn't have a terribly strong footing in trying to overturn it.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics