Reply to Lock him up indictment FL

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Lock him up indictment FL"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump still has the criminal charges coming in Georgia too.  At least he has something to do in his retirement.  Be a criminal defendant.  [/quote]

“We’ll get him on something, somewhere!”[/quote]

“Because he flouted laws and rules at every turn.”
[/quote]

So did Hillary per Comey. She just didn't mean to  :roll: [/quote]
Yes, Comey knows you have to prove intent to convict at a trial. Why don’t you?[/quote]

Know what else you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. That the person who Trump showed the document to actually saw its contents. The fact that it’s nowhere in the indictment speaks volumes. Remember they are trying to prove espionage act and that he deliberately meant to compromise national security.[/quote]

He's not charged with dissemination so they do not have to prove that.[/quote]

EXACTLY what makes the case so weak. [/quote]

Why would that make the case weak? They charged retention, and they have overwhelming evidence of that.  That makes a case strong, not weak.[/quote]

I think you will find the SC will again, overturn any verdict in that regard. A President can retain their own presidential records. [/quote]

No, no they cannot.  Those records have to go to NARA.  The president has the right to "access" them, not retain them.  And in any case these were not even presidential records.  [/quote]

Untrue[/quote]

"Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, or if a President serves consecutive terms upon the conclusion of the last term, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President."  44 USC 2203(g)(1).[/quote]

Please cite the part of the act where there are criminal penalties

In fact, the Presidential Records Act has NO criminal penalty because the Congress and Carter had no intention of criminalizing document retention matters. [/quote]
None of the charges have anything to do with the PRA, numbnut. Read the indictment.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics