Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "APS: Think the "no move" campaign is going to work?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We are a McK family outside of Reed walk zone but we are not filling out the "no move" petition. It stinks to lose our walkable neighborhood school but we don't see other good options to rebalance and gain enough seats. But, [b]McK is such a new school, it concerns us to hear ATS folks requesting renovations to retrofit the school..[/b]. huh? Besides freshening up with a coat of paint, APS should just shut down any attempts to waste our taxpayer dollars needlessly. It's a larger school (playground is small, tough luck) so just deal with it! [/quote] Agreed. What does ATS need structurally customized to its program? Does it even need a fresh coat of paint? Give 'em a new sign and call it a day.[/quote] Not fair at all to all APS ES's but the reality is that McK has one half-a$$ed playground and ATS has 5 play spaces. That's messed up! I understand that Fleet does not have adequate playspace and many S. ARL playgrounds suck. Not cool. I'm a McK parent and don't think the playspace is safe. No matter what school or program is there, it needs to be bigger/ there needs to be another space. Also APS needs to ensure that all Es's have adaquate play spaces.[/quote] Maybe SA schools' playgrounds suck in comparison because NA PTAs buy playground equipment.[/quote] Do S. Arlington playgrounds suck? I have been to Claremont, Abingdon, Drew, and Barcroft and think they are good playgrounds. [/quote] I'm the PP with the NA PTA comment. I haven't seen all the playgrounds in SA; but the ones I've seen are fine. Though I can't say Fleet's playground looks very enticing, it is at least shiny and new - and apparently non-inclusive. I was just responding to the comment that many SA playgrounds suck, apparently as a NA parent sees it. So by comparison, I guess SA playgrounds don't meet expectations of those at schools with PTAs who can buy fixes for APS' deficiencies. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics