Reply to Commander in Chief Forum

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Commander in Chief Forum"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.[/quote]

The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.

Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email. [/quote]
Well, we know that she had instructed one of her aides to remove classified headers on a fax and send it unsecured. Bet she had the same instructions to her staff - and so she's sticking with the "no header" excuse. None of this would be an issue if she hadn't set up the secret unsecured server in the first place. [/quote]

Stop trying to rewrite history.  Do you even understand the meaning of "nonpaper." [/quote]
Geez. By "non paper," she meant electronic. So she told her aide to take a secured "paper" document (the fax), remove any security markings (!), and email it instead. So that's how she figured she'd get away with it. Just make sure nothing that is sent to her is marked classified, and she'd be in the clear. Only thing is, that's not how it works. She signed a document to protect classified material, whether marked or unmarked. The header is NOT what makes it classified. But people like you continue to fall for her ever expanding web of lies.

1. There was no classified material.
2. I never sent/received anything that was classified at the time.
3. I never sent/received anything that was marked classified at the time.
4. There were no markers in the header, and therefore it wasn't classified.

Face it, she was determined to hide her wrongdoings from FOIA requests (or a Congressional subpoena as it turned out), and hence bleached her server contents after the subpoena came in. Obstruction of justice right there. And intent.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics