Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Falls Church - Say no to Sunrise signs?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=tarashaun] 3) Sunrise is interested in this parcel exactly BECAUSE it is residential (R-3). If it had to purchase a commercially zoned property, the price tag on a parcel this size would be much higher. It's getting a great deal on this property because it was priced with the expectation it will be developed into single value comes, instead of a I have several concerns about this, and please PM me if you share them: uch higher density property. Sunrise is the winner here, at our expense. ... My understanding is that Sunrise is paying more for the parcel than a developer would pay. [/quote][/quote] Actually, the church was offered MORE by developers of single family homes, but prefers to sell to a nursing home so took the lower offer.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
