Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Wall Street Journal article says Clinton might not be the nominee"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Apparently there is still hope for Bernie if he wins California. There is also the possibility of a new candidate emerging such as Biden or Kerry. http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-might-not-be-the-nominee-1464733898[/quote] Bernie will get CA.[/quote] It doesn't matter, PP. Because even if he wins, the delegate split will be close to even. It's all about delegates. Clinton just won the USVI, and by such a big margin that she may net more delegates there than Beenie did from his Michigan win. Tomorrow is PR, which has 60 delegates. It's a bigger prize than all but 7 of the states Bernie has won. It has more delegates than MT, SD and ND combined, states Bernie will win Tuesday. HRC will win by a good margin in PR. Then when the polls close in NJ Tuesday, she's the presumptive nominee. No matter what Beenie claims, that's what is going to happen. He may hold more rallies and lobby superdelegates, but he shouldn't. Elizabeth Warren said today that superdelegates should not determine the outcome of the primaries. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics