Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Why is polygamy illegal?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Even beyond any religious objections, polygamy is not a victimless crime. The laws against bigamy protect the first wife, who could lose most of the benefits and security of marriage without her consent. [/quote] If someone is victimized there are already laws in place to protect them. What [i]benefits [/i]would be stolen from the first wife? How would her [i]security[/i] be jeopardized?[/quote] Pro leaglization pp here. I would make it mandatory that the pattern be established BEFORE the first marriage. IOW, the couple would have to check the box, that they plan a polygamous relationship, and both parties would have to consent. [b]BTW, in serial monogamy, the first wife nearly ALWAYS gets screwed[/b]. [/quote] Sounds like she would probably get screwed in polygamy as well. [/quote] Except she does not need to leave, she can stay. [/quote] If she doesn't consent, then she needs to leave. So she either stays on unhappily, and screwed economically, or she leaves, and gets screwed economically.[/quote] It sounds like she doesn't have a choice. HE can choose another wife and SHE can either stay or leave, jeopardizing her kids' economic standing. That's not a choice. That's a threat.[/quote] OK< but what is the difference? If the man wants to leave, he will, monogamy or not. The only way to protect first wife in either situation, is to have a consistent way of making sure that her rights are preserved. The laws would have to be written as such. From what I know, things are getting worse for women in divorces. These short alimony terms like rehabilitative alimony make no sense. They put a 55 year old woman out there to get through school in 4 years, then find a job, and accrue assets right before retirement? It is a financial slam right now. Don't fool yourself, years ago when women got half and alimony for life, then we could talk fair. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics