Reply to Murch meeting tonight on swing space

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Murch meeting tonight on swing space"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would be in favor of swinging to Forest Hills but only if it could be the whole school (could they use two-story trailers as at Hearst?).  I am opposed to any students swinging on site due to health, safety and learning environment issues. The idea that NPS would agree to the use of the land between Murch and Deal for play space is as uncertain, if not more so, than the deal with UDC. In addition, having counselors, reading specialists, special ed staff split their time between two sites would reduce the time they could spend with the kids who most need support - especially in the middle of the upheaval the renovation will bring. [/quote]

Agreed.  Forrest Hills is fine - if the whole school stays together.  An additional Forrest Hills concern was that the playground wasn't enough for the bigger kids and there wouldn't be enough field space once all the trailers get on there.  And the Nurse - if it is an urgent situation and she is on one site then what?

What makes me laugh (and not in a ha ha kindof way) is every time someone mentions the "cafeteria trailer/tent"  That is already an upgrade for Much kids who eat in classrooms due to the lack of a cafeteria.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics