Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "terrorist attack in Paris "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele]Separate from the discussion of the killing in Paris -- and maybe this needs its own thread -- but is anyone bothered by how Muslims are portrayed in the cartoons? I emphasize that no matter how distasteful I might find the drawings, the magazine still has the right to publish them and there is absolutely no justification for the killings. But, that said, the drawings I've seen emphasize Semitic features such as long noses, etc. If these drawing were depicting Jews, I am fairly certain they would be criticized as anti-Semitic. In that case, I don't think we would be seeing such strong defenses of freedom of expression as we are now seeing. I suggest that we might want to distinguish between the artists -- whose rights we support -- and the art -- which I personally am not sure I want to defend. [/quote] I think it depends on how all other groups are depicted. If everyone is in caricature, then who cares? Are the actual people being depicted and caricatured? If so, making a big-eared person have really big ears seems like what cartoonists do, not offensive. Not sure noses should be any different. However, if all non-Muslims are portrayed with "normal" features and only one/two groups have features emphasized, that's more troubling. But, again, I think we risk conflating two questions: 1) Should the free speech rights of these artists be defended and the killings unequivocally defended? (Right answer: yes.); 2) Is this art offensive? (I don't know the right answer to that one.) I think that we shouldn't even be discussing Question 2 at this point. It's irrelevant. It's a question for another day, because it doesn't impact the answer to Question 1, which is what's at issue today.[/quote] SORRY. I meant "killings unequivocally condemned" obviously. BAD typo.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics