Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Feeding Bancroft and Shepherd across park undermines efforts"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]#2 of 17:19's comments especially resonates with me: 2. I think part of DME's plan is to build up McFarland & Roosevelt, which is something that makes sense to me. I think part of accomplishing that goal is to push more engaged families into those schools, via boundary changes. To give those schools the best chance of success, I think DCPS should increase the number of families going to those schools. Communities like Bancroft & Shepherd -- just like Crestwood -- would help build critical mass at McFarland & Roosevelt. Both of those neighborhoods are closer to Mcfarland/Roosevelt than to Deal/Wilson, so the idea of "neighborhood schools" would seem to benefit from routing the feeder patterns that way. Could be that when that happens, schools and Bancroft and Shepard will be begging to get into the trendy, more convenient McFarland and Roosevelt and DCPS will graciously accede to their wishes, especially since Wilson will be bursting at the seams again.[/quote] By critical mass we all know you mean higher SES families. How is Bancroft at 70% low income going to help with that?[/quote] I did not write the "critical mass" comment so was not thinking about higher SES families when I suggested that Bancroft and Shepard would eventually want to Roosevelt. If Roosevelt brings in a higher SES group, it will also want the lower SES bancroft crowd for diversity, no?[/quote] I'm the one who wrote "critical mass." Despite what you might claim, it's not code for high-SES. It refers to students and families. If those students and families are motivated, are expecting a school that functions as well as Deal or Wilson, and are willing to work to improve their school, so much the better. I don't see SES as necessarily linked to those characteristics.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics