Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Revised Boundary Recommendations to be released on or about June 13"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Reading the thread about School Within a School and Ludlow Taylor ( http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/135/388579.page ) I can't help but think their situation was impetus for the choice sets idea. If I understand it correctly, these are two geographically close schools, one with specialized programming open to city-wide lottery. Most families at the school live within proximity, if not in-boundary, and they'd like a proximity preference to truly make it a "neighborhood" school that's still open city-wide. But that might harm progress being made at Ludlow-Taylor, where families also want to see growth in IB attendance. I'm not advocating choice set as a solution here, but it's an eye-opening example of how that policy might work. Everyone with geographic proximity gets a preference in a ranked lottery for both schools (and whatever other schools are nearby) and get guaranteed placement in one or the other. [/quote] They're not really analogous. The choice set is to throw a much wider swath of Capitol Hill into the mix (including parts that aren't nearly as close to either school you named), and make it a free for all lottery among 5 schools. And at least that choice set had two existing specialized school options. Many didn't.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics