Reply to Why Does Van Ness Elementary School Not Have a Boundary

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Why Does Van Ness Elementary School Not Have a Boundary"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Except, if you don't open a school that is acceptable to CQ families, you won't have any CQ families DC in DCPS elementary schools.  Which will change the nature of the city.  The residents of the new condos and apartments will be defined by what schooling is available to them.  And the people paying big bucks for housing aren't going to send their children to A-B.  Just ain't gonna happen.  Creating a 35% FARM school for these families is a net positive for DC's finances.  The extra real-estate taxes accruing on the extra priciness of these condos and the extra income taxes more than pays for the cost of a not yet full elementary school.

You can look at this as 'entitled' (yep, it is!) or as a trade-off (pay taxes, get services you value).  It is still a better deal for the city than not providing a school that high-SES city residents will use. [/quote]

This is exactly right.   There will be a lot more housing in the Capitol Riverfront than just Capitol Quarter.   "The Lofts at Capitol Quarter" apartments (195 units), Park Chelsea (432 units), River Parc (287 Units), "Gallery At Capitol Riverfront" (324 units), "Ballpark Square" (326), Riverfront on Anacostia (305), Twelve12 (218 units), Yards Parcel N (327 Units), Foundry Lofts (200 units), Velocity Condos (200 Units), Capitol Hill Tower (300 Units).  Not to mention that EYA is planning a condo in the area with about (150 units).

This is a LOT of housing in the Capitol Riverfront that's outside of Capitol Quarter, and this housing becomes a lot more attractive to middle-upper income families if they know they are zoned for a successful elementary school like Van Ness Elementary will be.[/quote]

Middle-upper class families (however you define the term) will not be climbing over one another for the chance to buy a luxury condo in Near Southeast just to send their child to Van Ness.  Even with a shiny new Vida Fitness and Whole Foods, your aren't living in the Upper West Side for chrissakes.  [/quote]

True.  Anyone looking for the Upper West Side experience would rent on upper Connecticut Ave., and be inbounds for Murch (although the Murch v. Lafayette v. Hearst topic is very hot among that set, it is for another thread).  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics