Reply to Low In Boundary at Hearst?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Low In Boundary at Hearst?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Lafayette Reno is schedule FY 2015 and 2016. Murch is scheduled FY 2016 and 2017.

Not that big of a difference. [/quote]

Wasn't talking about relative renovation dates. The point is that Lafayette is also an option for Murch's overcrowding, particularly for Murch houses closer to Lafayette. DCPS demographic projections are for continued decreased enrollment as the Lafayette neighborhood ages, which has already started (down to 689 with 85% in bound, where they've been over 700 in the past with in bound in the 90s) -- at the same time, the building is getting bigger starting next year. So there should be some room in the coming years to expand the boundary to include at least the Ward 4 people zoned for Murch. It should be considered. Lafayette is not shrinking as fast as Murch is growing, though, so it won't solve the whole problem.  It could be another outlet though.[/quote]

But Hearst has the in-boundary capacity now, seems to make sense to have families zoned there now --as opposed to theoretically in the future at L after renovations.[/quote]

Yes, that's why I said "another outlet." [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics