Reply to Yet another teacher has left BASIS and parents are in the dark

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Yet another teacher has left BASIS and parents are in the dark"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just to put your mind at ease, pp:  The courts have defined through case law what "appropriate" means in FAPE under IDEA.  It certainly does not mean that a SN child with cognitive delays be accommodated at an accelerated STEM focused school.  The school is not "appropriate" even if it is public and free.

Also, the limited resources excuse or "we can't afford it" is not an adequate defense for failing to implement a child's IEP.[/quote]

I don't think people understand Basis where it comes to acceleration.  Nobody is being forced to be accelerated at Basis.  Acceleration, i.e. things like placement into Algebra I in 5th or 6th grade, or into the LEAP program, is offered as a function of diagnostic exams to place students at a level appropriate to their mastery, but is only done at the discretion and by the choice of the families.  If the diagnostic says they are ready for Algebra I in 5th grade, that doesn't mean they have to do it.  They could also follow the regular course sequence as well and take Algebra I in 7th grade.  And, if a student did try jumping ahead into the accelerated track, they could always drop back to the regular sequence if it's too much to take on.

Also, there are probably thousands of public schools in districts all over the country which are STEM focused and which have acceleration and similar types of features - what Basis does is really not all that new or unusual.  As such, I seriously doubt that IDEA precludes this in public schools.

I'm no attorney but in my reading of materials around IDEA, I noted that one of the clear provisions of IDEA is that FAPE [i]requires that the quality of educational services provided to students with disabilities be equal to those provided to non-disabled students[/i] - so, if a family's intention is serious modification to the student's coursework to downgrade it to a level they feel is appropriate to the student's capability, then I would think the family's own expectation of the curriculum and workload is in fact no longer of equivalent quality as compared to what the other students are doing, would go against IDEA's stated definition of FAPE.  As such, any desired modifications asked of a school really can't downgrade the curriculum and expectations without violating IDEA as well.  If the school is expecting the student to meet an equivalent level of rigor as the rest of the students, then they are actually upholding IDEA and definitional FAPE requirement of equality to other students.[/quote]

Schools modify curriculums all the time. iDEA is so students can access the curriculum.  When people say modify the curriculum it may in some cases mean using an entirely different curriculum for that specific child. If that is what the child needs then the school has to provide it. I don't know what Basis does but we have been in a grade where our child was pulled for language to use a completely different curriculum at his level. He Wa the only child out of 75+ who used that specific curriculum. This happens all the time in IEP situations. I am sure Basis can handle that. They may not want to (seems with an investigation they really don't want to) but it would mean there are children who pass their grade using a different, perhaps less rigorous, curriculum.  I don't know what tey do in their other schools but they must have figured that out by now? [/quote]

If they have a totally different curriculum, then they are no longer "accessing the curriculum" per IDEA because it's not the same curriculum and it fails the language in IDEA of "equal" - basicallywhat you have created is a separate school within a school,  and that is inconsistent with IDEA language and the definition in FAPE.[/quote]

Wrong wrong wrong. They don't all have to access the SAME curriculum. Are you new to this? [/quote]

Why choose a charter that's all about curriculum when you aren't interested in their curriculum and want a totally different curriculum?  That's totally bizarre and illogical. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics