Reply to Surprise top-down changes to AAP center this fall . . .

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Surprise top-down changes to AAP center this fall . . ."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Re:  Haycock mixing gen ed and aap - what is next English and Math?  I agree in theory that it is good to mix kids...but in practice, how does a teacher meet all the needs of the children?  [/quote]

The same way they do in the Gen Ed classrooms where FCPS has eliminated ability grouping.  My Gen Ed child is not with like ability peers for math.  It's in the homeroom and somehow the teacher is expected to teach to the various levels.  Is it possible?  No, but that means a kid like mine falls farther behind while the AAP kids (who are only in the room with smart kids) get to be challenged and excel.  Shouldn't everyone be challenged?[/quote]
But, how is a AAP kid going to be challenged if your GE child is being catered to in the AAP program?[/quote]

My GE kid is not in the AAP program.  The point is that you are complaining about something that everyone else has to deal with already.  We should be pushing for ability grouping for all, not just AAP.  That might mean a non-AAP kid ends up in your AAP kid's math class because he or she might be accelerated in math but nothing else and keep up in the AAP math.  Why should that child be held back in math because he or she didn't get a certain score on a random test on a random day?  As it is now, the AAP kids get the challenge and everyone else is left in the dust.[/quote]
Except many AAP children are not getting the challenge because so many in AAP programs are not qualified to be there under the original purposeful requirements.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics