Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Why are there so many non AAP parents coming to the AAP board to derail discussions and complain?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If AAP were for the top 1%, wouldn't they need a new curriculum? It doesn't seem like the current curriculum would really cut it.[/quote] AAP has not been for the top 1% of students since 1964. It is a total fantasy to think that FCPS is going to drop the program down to 1% or even 5% any time soon. It just is not going to happen. [quote] Advanced Academic Programs (a/k/a AAP, AAP Level 4 Center, Gifted and Talented, or GT) in Fairfax County Public Schools [url]http://www.fcag.org/gtfcps.html[/url] [b]In 1964, FCPS created a GT Center program for about 1% of the 3rd through 8th grade students.[/b] [b]The Center program expanded fairly quickly to include about 5% of 3rd through 8th grade students[/b], who were selected based on ability test scores. In 1993, FCPS began admitting students to the GT Center program based on a combination of test scores, a Gifted Behaviors Rating Scale form, and other information. [/quote] [/quote] Tracking may still have existed at that time. (Does anyone know whether it did or not?) It would have been more doable for GT (now AAP) to include 1% or 5% of FCPS students if the remaining 99% or 95% could be further divided into different classrooms according to their ability. If your child is in the 80-84% of FCPS that barely missed the cutoff for AAP, how would it help them to have everyone except the top 1% of FCPS back in their class?[b] Then they might be in the second highest reading group rather than the highest reading group. [/b]The teacher might have to form more different levels, and when teaching to the class as a whole would have to address a greater range of students. So the time spent at just the right level for your child would be less. Will that really be helpful? [/quote] Reading level does not necessarily correlate to intelligence. My eldest DC was always in the lowest reading group in K and 1st grade, yet still qualified for AAP. DC was a late reader. Younger has a reading disability and has never read close to grade level, yet still qualifies for AAP.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics