Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Get involved in Syria: Yes or No? And why/not?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So . . . by fighting back and killing a good chunk of the Syrian population, we'll end the use of chemical weapons like Sarin? makes total sense to me, Pee-wee quote=Anonymous]I have gone back and forth, and I think the answer is that we have to respond, not for the sake of Syria, [b]but because chemical weapons deterrence depends upon it.[/b] The only way that we keep chemical weapons out of the equation of war is to punish everyone who uses it. We were wrong to ignore it in Iraq in the 80's and if we let it go again, everyone facing civil war is going to use it when desperate. Deterrence has to be backed up to have power, even if it brings no one peace.[/quote][/quote] If you want to belittle the strategies that have kept the most horrific weapons off the battlefield and population centers, so be it. No one likes having to enforce a ban, but the only way to prevent the use of such weapons as nerve gas or nuclear bombs is an iron clad guarantee that the world community will punish those who use them. Every nation possessing or attempting to possess these weapons is watching to see how the world responds. FWIW I don't think we have to kill a significant chunk of the population in order to retaliate. We don't need to win a war, only to take out enough of Assad's military capability.[/quote] So who do you think takes over after Assad's ouster creates a vacuum? I honestly want to know what you think happens to the future of Syria after we have invaded their country? Um, and last I checked Nuclear weapons are quite prolific, despite our policing activities. You are aware that China, Russia, and the US are major suppliers of chemical and nuclear weapons. In order eliminate these WMDs, we need to blow ourselves and the two other super powers off the map as well.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics