Reply to Top 10 public "ranking"?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Top 10 public "ranking"?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This thread is enlightening because it is such a stark reminder of how incapable people here are of evaluating universities. OP asks a rather strange question but then the discussion immediately descends into whether standardized tests are required and ED practices. Nothing on professor or department quality, unique programming, career and grad school outcomes, or the like. Nope. Entirely focused on admissions practices.[/quote]
[b]Because student quality matters the most.[/b] A Nobel laureate cannot teach a lottery student who needs remedial math.[/quote]

Did you even attend college? When I read things like this I wonder if the people here actually attended and took advantage of the things that existed at their schools. The “quality” of the other students wouldn’t have even been in my top 10 of things that mattered. And any school in a discussion of top 10 has more than its share of “quality” students. If you’re brilliant at math you’re in the 300 and 400 level classes with the other brilliant math kids, not sitting through remedial math.[/quote]

Tell me you didn't attend a selective school without telling me.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics