Reply to Forbes "New Ivy" List

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Forbes "New Ivy" List"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's interesting that the article is 90% about how these schools are incorporating AI into really everything throughout the curriculum.

Wasn't expecting that to be the thrust of it.[/quote]

No it didn't. It just said the reality of AI is changing hiring. The quote I took away was “The most promising talents today are beginning to emerge from institutions that prioritize intellectual rigor over inherited prestige.” And - "That Ivy League-wariness persists, with 37% of respondents this year saying they are less likely to hire Ivy League grads than they were five years ago, and only 6% saying they’re more likely to do so."

Talent matters. And companies recognize that all the hooked this and that at Harvard and Princeton generally aren't great hires in 2026. Students at colleges that prioritize real talent tend to be better. I mean this is a pretty obvious observation for anyone that has been paying attention for the past five years. [/quote]

I mean...yes it literally did.  The first three paragraphs are about how AI is changing the jobs landscape.  The next 4 paragraphs are about how the schools on the list are adapting to this new environment by incorporating AI.  Then there is the 1 paragraph that you pulled from above.  Then there like 8 more paragraphs again about how the schools are using AI.

So... you are correct because it's more like 95% of the article is how these schools are using AI.

BTW...that paragraph is really just utter bullshit and I have a kid at an actual Ivy and a "New Ivy" that's on the list.  Both are great for these kids but my Ivy kid has so many opportunities available to them.  [b]The issue is the people responding to the Forbes survey are coming from your traditional corporate environments (think executives at Coca Cola or P&G), and it's true the Ivy kids aren't particularly interested in these jobs much anymore.[/quote]
[/b]
THIS. Ivy (and Chicago, Stanford, MIT) have student bodies in which 90% are chasing either MD, pHd, JD or a top job in tech or quant finance or top consulting MBB or launching a startup. They do not want traditional corporate. This is not new, it is exactly how it was at my ivy 28 years ago. 
The top tech and finance companies remain fixed more than ever at targeting ivies plus about 10 other schools, 2 of which are on this "new ivy" list and do not need to be because those who know already know they have ivy-level students. 
[/quote]
The only thing ivy.plus can give that these other private schools cant is a consistent path to quant other wise they're just as good. I would take Emory for premed over most ivys. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics