Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "COVIDs Continuing Impact on Reading Scores"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am baffled by this. I have a 2nd grader. She's a terrific reader. She missed the school closures of Covid so got to have normal PK and K even. She was reading on her own by the summer before K (just sounding out words) and then got good, phonics-based reading instruction in K and 1st and it really took off. Her preschool was play based and that was great for her. She was actually in a Title 1 for PK-1st (we're in DC with universal PK so she did PK at at a public elementary) and now is at a non-T1. My perception is that her cohort is full of strong readers. We live in a MC/UMC neighborhood. There are plenty of bookstores and libraries here. Most people are college educated and the adults read (both to kids and on their own). Literacy is definitely valued as part of the culture here. There are also kids who struggle but the schools and parents are getting them support they need for LDs and other issues. I do think Covid had some lasting effects on this cohort of kids, because I think Covid and other forces changed our culture permanently -- we never really returned to a pre-Covid existence. But I don't see it in the academic performance. The kids I know seem fine. Not saying the studies are wrong, it's just not reflected in my experience at all. And we aren't wealthy outliers -- no tutors, most families can't afford nannies or a SAHP, pretty standard in terms of childcare and extracurriculars for kids, schools are good but not considered the best in the area or anything. They are "good enough" schools for people at our SES level who can't afford private or to live in very expensive school boundaries. So I don't get it, but I don't think it's just Covid. Because if it was, you'd see the effects everywhere and I don't see them here.[/quote] The reading issues are more strongly correlated with Lucy Calkins and the Whole Language crap. More became aware of reading gaps during Covid, but NAEP reading test results had been poor even before Covid. PP just above was lucky DC received Phonics-centered instruction, because many studies have shown that is what works for all kids. (dyslexic kids benefit most from Orton-Gillingham which itself is Phonics based). Listen to the "Sold a Story" podcast and then weep. An entire generation of teachers and students were mis-taught. [/quote] This doesn’t and sense because Lucy calkins was more popular before Covid. If that were the cause, then reading scores should have improved as more states abandoned it. [/quote] Lucy Calkins/LLI/Queuing - call it whatever you like - was still widely used at the onset of Covid, even though strong data had come out against it back in 2005. GWB wanted to bag it, but then 9/11 happened and the Lucy etc. al lobby fought hard against it and it was abandoned. Reading scores went down in correlation with loss of phonics. It was not Covid. Covid just shed sunlight on it. [/quote] I'm in a 10/10 GS public elementary and I can confirm that we use Lucy Calkins. The reading specialist and K-2nd teachers use and suggest 3 cueing. I had DD meet with a different specialist from a different district and she 1) said DD didn't have any issues reading and was actually above grade level 2) talked about leveled readers and 3 cueing. I thanked her and went home, and immediately rolled my sleeves up and taught her how to read myself. She absolutely had issues with reading! She was guessing words rather than sounding things out phonetically. She was actually TAUGHT to guess. That's still wild to me, thinking about it 2 years later.[/quote] Yup. My kids are the lucky ones who learned in spite of LLI. They did struggle and I helped them at home (without a formal program, but did teach them to sound out words) and thankfully that was enough for them. I feel so terrible for the kids who are now in MS/HS or older who could be strong readers and just never received the right instruction. Their families trusted the school and the school let them down. [/quote] From what I can tell, the families do not suspect the school at all, even after the school has failed them. The school also has no idea. Usually the kids get remedial help at some point (which is a mixed bag), and by middle school parents are pushing to get them accommodations like extra time. Obvious there are LD kids with accurate diagnoses who need accommodations, but I don't believe it's in the numbers we are seeing.[/quote] Yes there are lots of teachers at my school who STILL get defensive and insist that Lucy Calkins/LLI/Balanced Literacy were great and got a “bad rap.” Parents have no idea their kid was never given explicit phonics instruction. Parents if your kid is older than 7, chances are they were never given explicit phonics instruction in northern Virginia. If they struggle to read, this is likely why. [/quote] Zero teachers are discussing this with parents unless they are clueless about social skills. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics