Reply to My gut feeling on 3/26 BOE vote

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "My gut feeling on 3/26 BOE vote"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OK, I've now asked the same thing twice and the lawsuit poster is ignoring it which I take to mean the following: They HAVE actually asked the State whether they believe this is "more than a boundary issue" or whether they can/wish to get involved with the use of Crown, which they helped pay for, if it is going to be for a purpose other than an additional high school, and the answer was NO-they don't care. This means they are now hanging all hope on some judge to tell the State that they effectively, aren't doing their job. I'm not a lawyer but that seems like not something any judge would do.  [/quote]

Bruh no one is answering you cuz they aren’t going to explain to you their legal case. You want to read it? Wait for the vote and the read what they file.

My brother in Christ: have some patience instead of expecting people to lay out a lawsuit on an anonymous forum. Jesus. [/quote]

This was just a question but it also seems like if they truly wanted this to be different or believed they were right (evidence that the state cared in hand), they would share this with MCPS or others BEFOREHAND so as to get this option off the table.

Logically, if the answer was that yes, the state believes they should be or want to be involved in this because it was in their scope, the filers would JUST HAVE COME OUT AND SAID IT. And honestly, that evidence would have made this option moot. And yet, here we are.

That said, it seems obvious there is absolutely 0 chance that the state told some random people that "hey, yea, you're right, we SHOULD be involved in that issue and what they are doing is illegal" without MCPS actually knowing this and changing course because the State said they were unhappy about it and why bother when you KNOW the State disagrees with you. Logic fails here to 1) think that the State believes this is in their purview 2) think that some judge is going to tell the State that they are wrong about knowing their own scope. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics