Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "AAP Expansion and Haycock - Elizabeth Schultz amendment"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You clearly don't understand the relationship between a student and teacher. These are third graders-not high school kids. Again, it was inappropriate and in poor taste. If the principal approved it, she was inconsiderate of the kids as well--but she does not have the personal relationship with them that the teacher does. The teacher should have known better.[/quote] She was exercising her rights and made it very clear nothing should be taken personally or as directed at individual students. If students were upset, it was more likely not because of anything she said, but because of what their parents may have said to them before and after she spoke. And absolutely nothing that she said spoke to her relationship to her students this year. [/quote] Her students are very bright kids. They know what all of this means and can read between the lines. If they wanted a teacher to speak, it would have made more sense to have a gen Ed teacher speak. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics