Reply to Why are people mad that kids of principal donors are institutional priorities?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Why are people mad that kids of principal donors are institutional priorities?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I handle that better than dumb athletes at T10/20/Ivies.

[/quote]

Those dumb athletes are both smarter and more successful than your children. Was just hanging out with some Cal and Stanford volleyball players this morning. They would eat your kids as snacks.[/quote]

You are missing the point.  The point is that they are not as smart or academically qualified as other non-athlete applicants who are denied admission.  Schools have different academic standards for recruited athletes.  Have the decency to admit it.[/quote]

Or you could say they have different athletic standards for some kids. If you can't throw a ball, kick, run, or shoot baskets you better have high test scores. They are allowed to have different priorities for a class.[/quote]

This is not true because athletic preferences are almost binary.  A 3 sport high school student that is not recruitable has no advantage over a kid in a wheelchair.[/quote]

That's true but we're talking about recruitable ones. If you're not a stand out in your sport then it's not going to help. That's why it doesn't really matter what you do in HS as long as you do something. Very few kids are good enough athletes to be recruited and non athletes aren't competing with them in anyway. They are different pools.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics