Reply to SWS moving to Prospect LC building?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "SWS moving to Prospect LC building?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]L-T families have only lost what they never had. The real losers are the Cluster families who thought they were going to have preference for SWS and now won't.[/quote]

This.  I bought into the Cluster 3 years ago hoping to eventually send my kid to SWS, and now I'm totally screwed.  This is BS.  Too bad Cluster parents just can't get it together.  Imagine if DCPS tried to make Brent into a city-wide school.  The moaning would never end.[/quote]

Me too.  But the current Cluster parents DID get together.  They are the ones who screwed us.  They didn't want to send their kids to Watkins, so they lobbied to expand SWS to higher grades.  Note that they also got to keep sibling preference.  They didn't care (much) about the boundaries because they're all in.

The people who did not successfully get together are the *future* SWS/Cluster parents.  Like you and me.[/quote]

First of all, the current Cluster and SWS are not the same thing, and even when they shared a building and feeder they were separate entities.   In the initial SWS expansion there was a one time allowance for movement between Peabody and SWS -- families moved both ways on that front.

There's an outsider and an insider perspective to this.  Some families may feel left out, but they are probably not aware taht SWS was close to being shuttered outright by DCPS within the past 2 1/2 years.   IB or otherwise , it wouldn't even exist as a future option for your infants and toddlers if that threat was realized.  It had to move/expand or cease to exist.  DCPS made the call on boundaries, not the school.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics