Reply to Media is snooping: Wootton officer was not at Lakewood

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Media is snooping: Wootton officer was not at Lakewood "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Mad Mommies of MoCo have something new to be Big Mad about! News at 11![/quote]

You aren’t mad? Hope your kid’s school doesn’t have a shooting next.
You are absolutely dog shit if you think this is ok.[/quote]

Let me guess, you think having a cop in the school would prevent it? Kind of like it did at Uvalde or Parkland?

Cops in schools are pointless and only create a false sense of security, as we've seen time and time again. Most cops are cowards. And they're all bastards and shouldn't be in any position to have any influence over impressionable school children.[/quote]

Exactly![/quote]

Idk why this is so hard for people to understand. It doesn’t matter how effective or ineffective you think CEO SRO or an officer of any type is in school.

An officer saying he was on ABC location at the time of the shooting when he, in fact, was not as proven by footage is a problem in and of itself.[/quote]

The footage did not prove he wasn't there.  The footage is not from the time of the shooting.[/quote]

Yes it was. Per our principal, he shows up for 45 seconds around 1:30 pm. He never shows up afterwards. She checked tapes from 1 through 3:30 pm.

That’s a 45 minute gap.
Shooting happened at 2:15 pm.

[b]It’s only a matter of time before this footage is released to the public[/b].

Stop helping the cover up.[/quote]

There is no footage available that proves the officer was not at Lakewood at the time of the shooting.[/quote]

Actually Lakewood principal has sent this footage to her direct supervisors, as well as Dr Taylor.

Please verify your facts before you speak.

Ask Lakewood staff.

[/quote]

Let me be clear on what the general public knows and has access to:

1. footage of the officer being at Lakewood briefly, but not at the time of the incident.
2. The RCPD showing logs of the officer's whereabouts and claiming he was at Lakewood

That's it.

Nobody has produced anything in writing or recorded of what the principal allegedly said, nor has the principal made any statement publicly on the record.
[/quote]

A statement was made by the principal on parent square. I would attach an image if I could. Literally ask any Lakewood parent. Ask Lakewood staff about the staff meeting about what the principal said.[/quote]

All of that is hearsay.  Honestly, I'm not saying it isn't true.  But it is odd that no image of this parent square statement has been produced anywhere.  And the principal hasn't said more publicly.  Why did the report not get any statement from anyone?  Even the one person they talked to was anonymous.  Why?  And what a parent heard that a staff member said they heard from a principal is just...not real verified fact.

[/quote]

Because literally no one wants to go head to head against the police? [/quote]

I mean OK. But if that is the case, what do you expect to happen here.  The police say the officer was there, publicly, and show logs.  Nobody is willing to come forward with [b]any[/b] contradicting evidence....so end of story.[/quote]

The contradicting evidence is the Lakewood footage. This will come out sooner or later once media gets its hands on it through a MPIA. Just be patient.[/quote]

How is it that some footage was already released then?  Who did that?  (The released footage does not prove the officer was not there.)[/quote]

There’s no released footage so far.[/quote]

You’re right, my mistake.  It was just an anonymous allegation in this thread.

That makes it even less likely that there is an issue.

We have an RCPD officer on camera “unequivocally stating” that the officer was at Lakewood and logs showing the officer was there.

On the other hand we have….absolutely nothing to contradict that.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics