Reply to The right wing fighting a fantasy war over sorority dances

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "The right wing fighting a fantasy war over sorority dances"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait. [/quote]

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life. [/quote]

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that. [/quote]

The ad copywriters were well aware of the jeans/genes wordplay and who it would appeal to.  Stop gaslighting.[/quote]

While I agree it was deliberate, pp’s argument wasn’t gaslighting. Since you don’t know what gaslighting means, you probably should avoid accusing someone of doing it.[/quote]

Gaslighting is the manipulation of someone’s perception of reality. One common technique is to try to persuade the person they aren’t seeing what they think they’re seeing, especially when it comes to dogwhistles.  That is precisely what PP was doing.

Since you don’t understand what gaslighting is, you should probably refrain from lecturing others about it.[/quote]

No, love. The original PP may have insinuated the first pp was being deliberately obtuse, but she wasn’t trying to manipulate someone’s reality.

Were you born stupid or dropped on your head as a baby or what? Maybe refrain from posting anymore at all — you clearly lack understanding of basic concepts. [/quote]

It’s cute when low IQ people try to be condescending.[/quote]

Clearly they didn’t get the good genes.[/quote]

👏👏👏👏good one, IQ is largely genetic after all which partially explains why MAGA wants to destroy higher education - their kids are too stupid to benefit. 😂😂😂😂[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics