Reply to FCPS is hiring an executive protection agent

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "FCPS is hiring an executive protection agent"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]1. She never listens to public opinion. Or thinks she is more moral and righteous than anyone else. She may attend “listening sessions” but if you compare her pre and post meeting plans it always seems that her mind was made up ages ago. Her public meetings are just a formality so she can claim she “listened”. Additionally, when she solicits public opinion via polling and survey they never are binding or heckled even impactful, no matter how decisive a majority. When a landslide 2/3rds didn’t want a renaming of WTW Woodson that would cost a cool million to undertake, she overruled them stating she had the moral high ground? Why even run a large scale survey and take thousands of peoples time if your morality is going to trump the poll results? Arrogance.

2. She never acknowledges the concerns of her opponents and uses sham investigations. Usual company and decision making letters all have some paragraph stating “while some opponents of such plan have argued, point XYZ, and having taken into account point XYZ and how it effects the merit of such plan” , she NEVER EVER does so. All her written explanations just include her vantage point and no one else’s. She never acknowledges differing views. So much for her “diversity focus”. She conducts residency checks by not asking for proof of mortgage or rental contract but via verbal confirmations as in the Hayfield case in which case everyone is free to lie without penalty to avoid scrutiny. She finds nothing wrong or suspect with that or multiple kids claiming homelessness to play football. Instead she has “full confidence”. Full confidence in the Region superintendent and her executive principals and the HR and vows to protect their jobs. Zero accountability. And if you even question the questionable conclusions of her questionable investigation tactics she declares your opinion void and “misinformed” or “uninformed”. She probably does far worse for non public controversies. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics