Reply to AI seems like a cult

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "AI seems like a cult"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Asking AI for sources is really the worst use for it- AI does best when you load in a document and ask for a summary, talking points, etc.

It’s also great for first drafts of things that don’t matter that much, like an email.

I’ve also loaded standard operating procedures and asked for improvements or automations I can make in processes.

I’ve also used it to grab code to automate some current processes- something that I really did not have time to figure out before- it’s amazing, but it’s a tool, and you have to know how to use it properly.[/quote]

I can see your point. At the same time, AI adds errors and mistakes. Checking for its mistakes takes as much time, or longer, than just doing the work myself from the start. [/quote]

Not really?  I’ve found high accuracy if I ask AI to summarize a document.  It’s recognizing patterns in text at that point, not trying to generate answers.  It saves an enormous amount of time.  I can ask it to draft out a memo and it basically works as an outline that I can fill in and elaborate on.

It’s a tool, it’s not magical, and you have to know how to use it.  You can’t treat it like voodoo or be overly reliant on it.  The more you understand how it works, the more powerful it becomes for you.[/quote]

Anyone who thinks AI is 1) actually AI and 2) a powerful tool is far too stupid to reliably check its output for accuracy.[/quote]

While it's not that impressive at the moment, about on par with a 100 I.Q. college educated human, when you compare it to what they were like 5 years ago, it's quite amazing how rapidly they are coming along and improving in their abilities. [/quote]

They’re just models, fool.  The same as models we’ve been using for decades without the “AI” branding.

There is nothing “intelligent” about any of this.[/quote]

The intentional hindrances are holding them back. 
Something like half of Google's staff are needed to keep A.I. from becoming too sentient, too racist, too homicidal, etc. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics