Reply to Neil Gaiman article in Vulture

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Neil Gaiman article in Vulture"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I hadn’t caught the bit about the therapist and wow, that is unethical.

[twitter]https://x.com/glosswitch/status/1879500264052588618[/twitter][/quote]

A lot of the people quoted in the article are sketchy AF -- not the accusers who largely sound credible if very troubled. But the therapist plus the mostly unnamed "sources close to Palmer" who agreed to speak to the journalist on Palmer's behalf. It's clear they are trying to craft a narrative where Amanda didn't know what was going on, was acting charitably with regards to the nanny, and that this all took her by surprise and then she took action to protect her son.

I agree with others that if you read between the lines, it's fairly obvious that Palmer knew what was going on and either purposefully or tacitly served these women up for Gaiman. It's also pretty obvious they are in the middle of nasty divorce/custody proceedings and that Palmer is looking to burnish up appearances so she can get full custody and a big support payment from Gaiman.

Honestly if I were the family court judge dealing with their custody issues I wouldn't want this kid to be with either of them.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics