Reply to Will Wake ever be in the #30s again?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Will Wake ever be in the #30s again?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30.  What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious:  does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC?  Nope. [/quote]

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.[/quote]
+1[/quote]

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well.  I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently.  Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above.  It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.[/quote]uva and usc are not peers with Wake or the others listed. No T25 is. Wake boosters are desperate and tried it with Emory last week and now UVA this week. [/quote]
No dog in this fight

UVA and USC are not peer schools. UVA is on par with UMD-CP, UIUC, Minnesota, and other 30,000 ish+ population public schools. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics