Reply to Removal of development cap in downtown Bethesda

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Removal of development cap in downtown Bethesda"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why is it bad planning to have no development cap?[/quote]
For one thing it makes everyone who bought bonus density into a chump. [/quote]

Are the people who bought bonus density complaining?[/quote]
They will be privately, certainly. In addition, what this signals to the market is that the county is not serious. So if you were a real estate investor, you just have to wait them out and eventually they will give away everything. I does the exact opposite of what they were hoping, because it makes a mockery of the rules and as a result decentivizes investors from investing now versus waiting into the future. [/quote]

It is widely known that the county isn’t serious. The county thinks it’s being pro-development but instead its just giving people reasons to wait. [/quote]
And as a result, lots of approved developments just sit there for years unimproved, like Westbard, Strathmore Metro, White Flint Mall, White Flint Metro, etc.

And speaking of Westbard, which is finally but slowly being built, EYA sold out 100% of their THs before breaking ground.

It’s malpractice that planning hates THs when they deliver density, consumers want them and communities don’t object to them.

And it’s a show of how extremely ideological Planning is to push missing middle instead. That should really concern everyone.  [/quote]

Attached houses (non-missing middle housing) are fine. Missing middle housing is fine too. [/quote]
Considering that people think MM is trash and don’t want it in their community but have no problem with THs, I do wonder why there is an ideological refusal to promote policies that deliver housing supply and compact growth with broad community support in favor of policies that don’t. [/quote]

Are you saying, "How come Planning isn't pushing attached houses instead of other types of middle housing?"

[b]Attached houses aren't really compact growth[/b], and the people who oppose Planning's housing proposals generally also oppose attached houses.[/quote]
Thanks for confirming that you are an extremist ideologue. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics