Reply to 2024 JonBenet Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "2024 JonBenet Documentary"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Here's a deep dive into the DNA for anyone interested.

https://www.reddit.com/r/JonBenet/comments/18sb5tw/the_facts_about_dna_in_the_jonbenet_case/[/quote]

I did look for a quick skim and found the following comment right away. The writer goes by the handle " SistersAndBoggs" . This was written 7 months ago. This comment states that DNA found on JonBenet's clothing matched the DNA found on her underpants. The DNA belongs to an unknown male:

"... Forensic scientist Dr. Angela Williamson, who performed some of the forensic testing, told CNN that early DNA testing was done of the crotch of JonBenet’s panties, where her blood had been found. The result was a very strong profile, she says, of an unknown male that could not be matched to anyone who had been near the scene or who had handled her body. It was also not a match to John Ramsey.

Williamson noted how thorough the DNA testing was. “They even compared this DNA profile with the man whose autopsy had been performed right before JonBenet’s.”

Also in 2006, a significant forensic finding was made by Williamson, who was employed by Bode Laboratories at the time.

She was approached by Boulder law enforcement to do touch DNA testing on some of the clothing JonBenet was wearing the night she was killed.

“Touch DNA are skin cells that you shed when you come into contact with anything,” Williamson explained.

Williamson personally selected both sides of the waistband of the child’s long johns “so logically where would someone’s hands be if they were pulling down someone’s pants. So that’s where we targeted, where we thought someone would’ve contacted the long johns.”

The results caught everyone off guard. Williamson told CNN the unknown male DNA originally found in the crotch of JonBenet’s underpants matched or “was consistent” with the unknown male DNA that was found on the waistband of the long johns.

“We were, like, this is pretty big. This gives more weight to the theory that this is from the perpetrator and not from manufacturing contamination.” (2016 CNN article)"[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics