Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Harris tax plan - raising taxes on high earners"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Make all earned income subject to the social security tax and not just the first $168,600. That would fix a lot. [/quote] The reason you cannot do that is then their benefits would soar too. And if you object to THAT you just completely changed SS into a pure welfare program and any semblance of bipartisan support for it (which is already tenuous) disappears. [/quote] That's not true under current law. If SS runs a surplus it must be invested in US Treasuries. And that isn't included in the calculation of US national debt and the deficit. And that's how Clinton was able to bring down the deficit. Social security surpluses were invested in US Treasuries.[/quote] This has nothing to do with surpluses. Social security taxes are linked to benefits. There is a max tax and also a max benefit. If you lift the cap on the tax but leave the benefit capped, you have fundamentally changed the nature of the program and gutted the bipartisan support for it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics