Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Macklin Development"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Dismal scene is the treeless Promenade. May we go back to call it a sidewalk, missing its high function service lane. Lost souls drift around, sleep in a new bench. Addicted and physically sick need medical attention. Office of Planning wrote in its development plan that planning for Conn Ave was for “integration interface.” None in the Office live here. Data is their guide. Developers/Smart Growth lobby ruining the Conn Ave Historic District.[/quote] +1. In retrospect I think the ANC made a terrible mistake in their all out push for “public spaces” while the city is simultaneously stacking the Connecticut Ave buildings with homeless and mentally ill. The commercial strip now seems less welcoming than it did before, which I did not think was possible. [/quote] How someone can walk down a spacious area, with new planters and trees just taking root, and say to themselves "this sucks I wish I was crammed up by the building jostling elbows with people and dodging opening shop doors while huffing in exhaust from idling cars instead" I can only chalk up to some extreme carbrain damage. Or maybe lead paint.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics