Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "2nd Grade Gifted and Talented Survey"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]These "GT designation is meaningless" posts miss the important point that, per state law, it [i]should not[/i] be meaningless. If MCPS is not doing a proper job of GT identification, they are breaking the law. If MCPS is not doing a proper job of providing differentiated education to those designated GT, they are breaking the law. If caregivers are dissuaded from associated advocacy for their children when MCPS breaks the law because folks keep saying GT designation is meaningless, that is a tragedy, and an especially inequitable one, as those with means are more likely to keep themselves otherwise informed than those without.[/quote] Does the law provide an age or a year when differentiation must kick in (I will freely admit I don't know the answer to that)? And what qualifies as differentiation? My DCs have been identified as being 'enriched' every marking period but even at our very good ES it just fades out because it is not actually sustainable. ELC is better, though, because it's designed to go faster and deeper. (rant) People always act as if high-achieving kids being bored constitutes some kind of dire tragedy. Insisting that high-achieving kids must always be coddled and stimulated and praised and featured is just as bad as ignoring kids who need extra help. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics