Reply to She signed to euthanize her dog last year. Now he’s up for adoption.

Forum Index » Pets

Reply to "She signed to euthanize her dog last year. Now he’s up for adoption."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Some of y’all can’t read. The shelter is a totally different thing than the rescue where she got the dog. Anyways, she sucks and hope she doesn’t get the dog back. [/quote]

She signed paperwork to be euthanized.  That is what the shelter said they'd do.  Instead they choose not to and handed the dog back to the rescue to resell.  The shelter should have contacted her and told her and said what would you like us to do we can save your dog.  Both acted unethically.  [/quote]

The paperwork said the shelter would treat and adopt out the dog if the shelter deemed that appropriate (source: Washington Post). She wasn't contacted because she gave up the dog. It's pretty reasonable for them to assume she'd taken all the vetrinary steps she was willing to. The fact her vets (two vets?) were wrong is terrible and if anything, that is the story - not the shelter/rescue.[/quote]

She did not exactly give up the dog.  She went to two vets who diagnosed the dog with a serious issue and either an expensive surgery and who knows if it would help or to euthanize.  She didn't know what to do, didn't have the money for the surgery (which sounds like it was wrong) and brought it to the shelter for advice/euthanized.  When they choose to have the vet look at the dog, which was appropriate as that vet was probably the one euthanizing, the vet said something else, cheaper surgery and dog was ok.  They should have [b]contacted the owner[/b] immediately when they said the dog didn't need to be euthanized as that was what she agreed/signed for.[/quote]

That's the problem right there. [b]She gave the dog up and signed him over to the MCSPcA shelter. When she did that she was NO LONGER the owner and had NO rights to the dog. When she signed the paperwork to give him to MCSPCA she checked the box stating that they would evaluate him and only euthanized IF necessary. She brought him there to be killed, NOT for advice. They never told her "we'll look him over and call you if we find a fixable diagnosis". She gave up on the dog and gave up her rights to him. [/b]

Now I do agree that it is unfortunate that the initial vets she visited did not properly diagnose or give her a good outlook and, as a previous poster noted, that is the real story here. But instead of that being the story new organization have thrown the rescue under the bus when all they did was the opposite of this woman- not give up on him and spending thousands to save him and give him a good quality of life. Now they are facing criticism from a bunch of keyboard warriors, many of whom lack reading comprehension skills,  who read one story, and one side of the story at that, and want to persecute them in the court of public opinion. They do incredible work and work insanely hard to save the lives of dogs and cats.

This woman does not deserve to get this dog back.

[/quote]

The bolded is both factual, and an utterly garbage policy. [b]If an animal is brought in for euthanasia, it should be put down, and the owner allowed to stay with the animal. If an animal is surrendered, the rescue should make that clear up front "If you sign this, the dog is no longer your dog, and the shelter will make whatever decisions we deem fit from this point forward, including rehoming, foster, euthanasia..."[/b]

But the whole "maybe we will, maybe we won't" serves no one. Not the owner, not the shelter, not the dog.

FWIW, I was at HRA over the weekend and someone was there to put their dog down. They were allowed to stay with their dog to the end. Some places do it better than others.[/quote]

So they should put down any dog that comes in just because that is what the owner wants and based on her word alone? And the  "maybe we will, maybe we won't" serves no one"- well it serves a dog that doesn't really need to be put down.

If she didn't agree with the shelter's policy then she should have had it euthanized by her vet instead of agreeing to the shelter policy, leaving the dog she claimed to love so much and walking away.

Keep in mind the people at shelter or rescues who are taking these dogs that are dropped off are not veterinarians or the ones putting the dogs down. They can not and do not make medical evaluations. They just take the owners word that they want to turn the dog over and let the trained professionals go from there. These policies are probably in place because of people will tell them to put down a perfectly healthy dog and they believe it is their right to act responsibly for a dog that is not under their care. [/quote]

The shelter and rescue should have worked with her to help her get the surgery.  They refused to help except if she handed over the dog.  It sounds like the rescue initially refused the dog too.  Now this poor dog will be in multiple homes, in foster care for over a year and no stability or love.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics