Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Increased incidence of squatting in empty homes/rental homes"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As far as I can tell, all of the stuff about “squatters’ rights” in this thread is all entirely BS fear mongering. In DC, “squatters’ rights” (adverse possession) require 15 YEARS of continuous occupation. The possession must also be “actual, open, notorious, exclusive, continuous, and hostile.” So totally unrelated to tenants (to whom these conditions do not apply) or to people committing B&E. In California, it’s 5 years, and you must have been the one paying property taxes and you must have made improvements. In NY, it’s 10 years. Is this thread another pre-election effort by Ivan?[/quote] Oh ffs. Stop it with the paranoid Russian bot accusations. The issue is not adverse possession. It’s that squatters can invoke tenants rights after 30 days, which means instead of getting the police to remove them as trespassers you have to go through housing court. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
