Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "NVA (Loudoun) going MLS NEXT?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I used to coach at Alexandria. Very organized club with pretty strict adherence to their curriculum plan. On one hand it made sure everyone was training the same way, on the other it limited your ability to tailor your sessions to fit your team's developmental needs. What worked well for the "top" team, didn't necessarily work for the lower teams when it came to addressing their deficiencies. I felt there was a huge over reliance on pattern and tactical play at the lower ages. Many times I saw 8 and 9 year olds learning how to play out of the back by standing in a shape and passing a ball with no pressure for 20+ minutes for multiple sessions... poor kids were bored out of their minds. Once you get pass the u-littles it's easy to see that their teams have a system of play engrained into them by the curriculum. Again as a pro, it means players can generally fit into and get used to moving up or down a team within the club fairly easily. However, as a coach I found this play method to be entirely too predictable and lacking in creativity and tactical options. I loved coaching against them as I knew exactly how they were going to approach the game, and they really struggled when forced to play a different way. As others have mentioned there is 0 emphasis on technical exercises, and while futsal certainly helps and is great for players of any age in my opinion, it's no substitute for dedicated skill practice, which Alexandria expects you to get on your own.[/quote] this is great info. can you give an example of how you adjusted your defending against the method? Was it something specific about their build-up or pattern?[/quote] Sure. Keep in mind my experience with them is primarily on the girls side, but as far as I know the curriculum is the same. Their build out pattern is taught the same starting at the very beginning of travel. Even the shapes they are taught to play are generally pretty limited, so I almost always know what I'm about to face. Pushing a high line taking those options away, and just generally making them uncomfortable under pressure does a lot to get them disorganized. They tend to only have a couple, if any, what I would consider very technical players on their teams that can play their way out. You can still get beat athletically, but well that's true of any team. Vision on the field becomes an issue, because they generally aren't used to having to play more direct options or breaking the lines so to speak, so barring some attempts at random long balls over the top or to the corners, mainly due to frustration or clearances, the deliberate build up is pretty easy to break down if you're not completely outmatched athletically/physically/conditionally. Of course you have to know what to look for and what triggers to expect - it's not as easy as I may be making it out to be, and of course your players have to be able to execute as well. Doesn't guarantee you a victory, but I can certainly say I've had teams that I would consider inferior to theirs, player pool wise, that were able to get positive results against them simply due to their hammered in predictability. Don't get me wrong, the way they try to play looks nice when it works, they certainly have their own identity and they certainly have talent that is good enough on their top teams to be competitive and make it work to a point. Past their top teams, things really start to break down in my opinion and the kids simply don't have the ability to play the way the club would like them to play, which is ironic since they ALSO don't teach them those skills at all. So while they may be tactically more advanced then most kids as several parents here have already alluded to, unless they are putting in some serious time on their own or with a trainer, they eventually fall off pretty hard technically. Given the amount of players and resources that club has, I feel that they should be performing much better than they do. Again, not that it's awful, I just think it can be MUCH better, especially for the non-A teams.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics