Reply to Does Test Optional Really Mean Test Optional

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Does Test Optional Really Mean Test Optional"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]40% of Cornell is probably hooked if you add up legacy, first gen, URM, and athletic admits.  A few years ago, 30% of the Harvard class was legacy.[/quote]

40% of 15k undergrads? What?!?

You guys are insane. Do some research on what colleges at Cornell are TO before spewing this stupid stuff.[/quote]

Exactly. People really really want TO not to be real.[/quote]

Not as much as some people REALLY REALLY REALLY want standardized testing to never return!

The TO era has unleashed a tidal wave of applications from fresh faced 4.00 u/w students who test poorly, but only on Saturday mornings.[/quote]

TO is disliked by families that are[b] okay with hard work and believe in fair treatment[/b], not the new BS equity that favors some groups over others.

I don't understand folks that complain bitterly about hooks like legacy, athlete, etc. and don't mind TO when those kids can skate in even easier now.[/quote]

TO can't be about equity if legacy, athletes, and rich donors can "skate in." Last I checked, those hooks aren't about equity and inclusion. I'm sure that plenty of people believe in hard work (measured by GPA) and that fair treatment means not having to submit test scores. You measure hard work and fair treatment differently.

--signed someone who believes test scores are valuable[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics