Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Bancroft-Specific Boundary Study Thread"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]chec for immersion and Deal for traditional middle school seems to be working fairly well. [/quote] Why not just CHEC? Clear feeder pattern and very close. It isn’t a full immersion school. It is Tubman’s only feed, so it works for non-immersion kids. [/quote] The middle school is dual language, and that is the only option. The Tubman and HD Cooke students often have a much more difficult experience than those coming from Marie Reed or Bancroft because they have to take content classes in Spanish with no foundation in the language. [/quote] So English-only elementary schools feed a bilingual middle school and a bilingual elementary school feeds an English-only middle school? And there are no English-only alternatives for Tubman and Cooke? That is messed up right there.[/quote] I'm looking at the slides from the advisory committee meeting in early December and seeing a scenario where Tubman and Cooke add a dual language track (slide 31). Is this for real? I had no idea this was a potential option. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics